A few stray items.This week's interview in Barron's was with Byron Wien. There were several interesting nuggets including this comment; ...whenever a category in the Standard & Poor's 500 gets to be more than 20%, you should probably pay attention, because a reversal is probably in store.
This is something I have harped on many times before, not that I claim any originality.
It makes sense to pay attention to sector weightings and pay heed to distortions from the norm. The crew at Bespoke usually has good info on this sort of thing. A sector becoming 30% is a clear warning (energy in the early 80's and tech at the start of this decade) but 20% might be a little less clear. Financials historically have been in the mid teens but had been hovering around 20% for several years before the crisis started.
Looking forward with this, energy seems to be one to watch. It has come up quite a bit this decade as you might imagine. I saw it top out around 16% but now is at 13.75%. If it does get to 20% or so I would be inclined to be underweight no matter what I thought of the fundies.
Another item from Barron's is that apparently the Bank of Japan, as in the central bank, is a public company. Barron's said the ticker in Japan is 8301. I found BNJAF for the five letter designator for US trading but it is not clear that it does actually trade. Both the Yahoo Finance and PinkSheets.com pages for the stock give the impression that there has been no trading for months.
Also the Barron's article says the Japanese government owns 55%, and you need its permission to own the shares. I'm not exactly sure what that means. Additionally the dividend is minuscule and the bank doesn't report earnings.
I am in no way advocating that anyone try to buy the central bank in Japan but I find the existence of shares to be fascinating. Central banks are meant to be independent so why not publicly traded? Central banks can fail. I was recently reminded that the current Federal Reserve is actually the third incarnation of a US central bank.
Buying shares in some central bank that presides over some monster surplus and a wealth fund is intriguing on some level.
One thing about ETFs that I did not get to in the video was that IndexUniverse is reporting that there is a Nordic ETF in the works that will mimic the FTSE Nordic 30 Index. The countries represented will be Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark. I might expect a lot of banks and a heavy weight in Vestas Wind (VWDRY).
Banks and Vestas is either right or wrong but all four countries have interesting companies and the effect of owning these countries might get blended away depending on what the fund ultimately looks like.
The picture is from the east end of Molokai near what I believe is mile marker 20. We hung out at a beach right across the street from this house.





6 comments:
Hi Roger. Your point about reversal to the mean got me thinking about Monte Carlo analysis. Some bloggers and high profile authors tout the tool as the holy grail for evaluating risk and return. Do you ever use it to construct portfolios? Thanks.
I do not use Monte Carlo simulations in my practice. Not sure what sort of impression I actually give but the impression that Monte Carlo simulations give me is being very academic and theoretical, not that it is bad by anymeans, but not right for me. I can envision over reliance on something of this type missing the forest for the trees at some point.
That might be unfair or wrong but that is just my take.
http://tinyurl.com/6lrhkj
beach reading:-)
Roger,
I may be oversimplifying but I heard some comments on the BofJ not too long ago. They went something like this: If you own a central bank who's rates are at 50 bps...what might happen to earnings if rates doubled to 100 bps? Or caught up to some sort of global standard of maybe 500 bps? Earnings would double...or in the second case increast 10 fold. Not to mention what might happen to multiple expansion. Any thoughts on this? THe thought of owning a central bank is quite intriguing indeed.
maybe i am upside down here but in a healthy-ish economy wouldn't a central bank be in the middle of money on the move? if so then would it be more about spreads?
in your comment i think their might be an implication of the earnings doubling on money they just printed this morning in the basement.
That Nordic ETF idea seems interesting.I always wondered it did not exist.I know there is a Nordic mutual fund.Will keep an eye on this new ETF.
Post a Comment