Wednesday, July 19, 2006
What About Currency OEFs?
....a reader asks.
Re currency allocation, is there a mutual fund(s) that are worth strong consideration that focus on currency as an allocation class? Why not let a professional mgr choose the country?
This is a good question. There are quite a few OEFs that are currency funds. I use one for clients from PIMCO. There are a couple of others; one from Franklin, there is the Merck Hard Currency Fund and I believe Prudent, as in the Prudent Bear Fund, may have a currency fund (not positive). There must be others.
Both the ETFs and the OEFs have plusses and minuses that investors need to weigh for themselves. The currency ETFs allow investors to capture narrow themes. If you buy into Switzerland as safe haven (which I do but it has not really worked in the last few days) FXF allows for unfettered exposure to the effect.
Other than the Mexican peso (FXM), I think there is a fundamental case to be made for all of the currency ETFs. I'm not saying you should buy any of them just that there are some compelling points.
If an investor comes to the conclusion that they should own the British pound they may get it in an actively managed fund that owns the pound for now but what's to say the manager won't change his mind in two months.
The upside of the OEF is that the manager knows what he is doing and the fund is very successful. The down side of the ETF is that the do-it-yourselfer does not know what he is doing.
I think this boils down to philosophy but keep in mind that some clients have exposure to both. As another example a reason to buy the Aussie (personal holding) might be its long-term correlation to gold. There is diversification benefit to this for US based investors. It may not be ideal, in this context, to buy an OEF that might stray away from the Aussie, again assumes the investor is going for a narrow effect.
If the Aussie perpetually zigs when the US zags it is doing its job as a diversifier even if it goes down.
As a quick note about the Aussie and gold, Bloomberg often notes in articles about Australia that the Aussie has a correlation of about 0.93 (on a scale of 1) to gold. David Taylor questioned this and while I don't know for sure, FXA in its very short life thus far has a 0.64 correlation to the GLD trust (client holding) according to PortfolioScience.com. I expect the correlation to tighten up some even if it does not get to 0.93.
A question about bid ask spreads came in. This is very far down on my list of things to worry about. The reader notes that the spread for the loonie (FXC) is 10-12 cents. I haven't checked but I'll take his word. Often, but not always, volume can print in the middle with a little patience.
The spread becomes more relevant when trying to make a short term trade. Every post about these funds on this site has been for use as a way to diversify the cash portion of your portfolio. If you are looking for a trade you need to consider how big of an issue this is for you.
Re currency allocation, is there a mutual fund(s) that are worth strong consideration that focus on currency as an allocation class? Why not let a professional mgr choose the country?
This is a good question. There are quite a few OEFs that are currency funds. I use one for clients from PIMCO. There are a couple of others; one from Franklin, there is the Merck Hard Currency Fund and I believe Prudent, as in the Prudent Bear Fund, may have a currency fund (not positive). There must be others.
Both the ETFs and the OEFs have plusses and minuses that investors need to weigh for themselves. The currency ETFs allow investors to capture narrow themes. If you buy into Switzerland as safe haven (which I do but it has not really worked in the last few days) FXF allows for unfettered exposure to the effect.
Other than the Mexican peso (FXM), I think there is a fundamental case to be made for all of the currency ETFs. I'm not saying you should buy any of them just that there are some compelling points.
If an investor comes to the conclusion that they should own the British pound they may get it in an actively managed fund that owns the pound for now but what's to say the manager won't change his mind in two months.
The upside of the OEF is that the manager knows what he is doing and the fund is very successful. The down side of the ETF is that the do-it-yourselfer does not know what he is doing.
I think this boils down to philosophy but keep in mind that some clients have exposure to both. As another example a reason to buy the Aussie (personal holding) might be its long-term correlation to gold. There is diversification benefit to this for US based investors. It may not be ideal, in this context, to buy an OEF that might stray away from the Aussie, again assumes the investor is going for a narrow effect.
If the Aussie perpetually zigs when the US zags it is doing its job as a diversifier even if it goes down.
As a quick note about the Aussie and gold, Bloomberg often notes in articles about Australia that the Aussie has a correlation of about 0.93 (on a scale of 1) to gold. David Taylor questioned this and while I don't know for sure, FXA in its very short life thus far has a 0.64 correlation to the GLD trust (client holding) according to PortfolioScience.com. I expect the correlation to tighten up some even if it does not get to 0.93.
A question about bid ask spreads came in. This is very far down on my list of things to worry about. The reader notes that the spread for the loonie (FXC) is 10-12 cents. I haven't checked but I'll take his word. Often, but not always, volume can print in the middle with a little patience.
The spread becomes more relevant when trying to make a short term trade. Every post about these funds on this site has been for use as a way to diversify the cash portion of your portfolio. If you are looking for a trade you need to consider how big of an issue this is for you.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





4 comments:
I agree - an active currency manager has potential to be a great diversifier, a source of returns uncorrelated to what is going on in equities and bonds. Some would argue that the presence of many players in the FX market for whom the primary motive is not short-term profit (such as central banks, tourists, corporations hedging/repatriating funds) there can be real opportunities for good currency managers to generate returns.
It might not be everyone's cup of tea (I believe it is a relatievly simple quant model), but I seem to recall news that Deutsche Bank intends to list a long/short currency fund in ETF form. I don;t know how to post links I am afraid (Roger or someone who does, please feel free to help out on this one!), but there was a story on May 9th on www.indexuniverse.com, called "The exchange-traded hedge fund" which commented on this proposed fund...
OT...The options scandal. Is it as huge as I think it may be? Is it taking down tech? Will there be a spill over?....and scold me if you would rather not have OT posts..
Londoner,
I wrote about the ETF you referenced. The proposed symbol is/was DBV. You click here to read my post which links to Index Universe's article.
Does OT mean off topic? Off topic is welcome. Is there anyone now that does not know options is an issue? Some portion is already priced in. The ultimate impact is unlikely to be a death blow, IMO, not that there won't be further fallout.
This reminds me of 2002 when CEO would have to sign off on earnings. UNH, the poster child for this is back above $50.
Re options scandal. Well, even if the mkt has already discounted it, it does BOTHER me that I'm not aware of anyone going to jail. I heard it is estimated that 2000 companies are involved.
Another OT. A colleague of mine used to trade intl mutual funds. He is a legend. Back in the 70's to 80's..over about a 20 yr period, he turned 10K into 600k. The accountant for the deferred comp program was sweet on me and unbelievably gave me this info. The top exec was incredible slow to find out. He eventually lost his trading privledges and hardly cares now. He feels that it's impossible to make a buck on what once was stale prices. He attributes this to the practice of "fair valueing the closing price." Roger, or anyone, how is fair valuing done? Today, theoretcially would have been a good day to risk a trade. Intl mkts were up but not has high here. Conceivably, there will be a half percentage point worth of momentum but there remains the dollar value. If the dollar bounces back into strength, it could be a painful loss of 1 percent. I took a risk on the trade, even today. I am not convinced that all mutual funds are participating in fair value trading,even though they are supposed to. If I was given the chance to be a white collar ass, guilty as charged. That's why we need better laws and the money to enforce them. Fraud on wall st would probably balance our budget.
Enjoy the variety of cured fish, cheese and hearty breads.And remember even Jimmy Carter would have lust in his heart if he was travelling to Scandanavia; they are beautiful to look at.
Post a Comment