Wednesday, August 17, 2005
Assorted Tidbits
On the drive back from Phoenix today I heard the first 20 minutes of Cramer on Sirius. He hit on two things that I thought I would touch on.
One was the First Israel Fund (ISL). I wrote about this fund on August 7. I bought it thinking it would be an intermediate term hold but I was lucky enough to catch a big move (relative to the time I held it). Despite what I what wrote about the trade I was really buying Benjamin Netanyahu, the recently departed finance minister and one time prime minister. Now that he is gone I am not sure how the situation has changed, if at all.
One point he pounded on was that ISL is trading at a discount to NAV. He warned not to buy it at a premium. I have written about this a few times. If a fund has traded at a premium of 5% or less for an extended period I don't think I would be turned off from buying it. A big change in the discount/premium picture might make me hold off however. A premium of more than 5% and I would wait but if a fund I already owned grew to large premium it would not be an automatic sell. ETFconnect has a chart that shows the historical relationship between the NAV and the market price. I was really surprised that Cramer picked this fund. I heard him on why and it makes sense but I am glad I'm out of the position now.
The other nugget was about energy stocks. If I heard him right he is suggesting lightening up on the group ( not zero exposure, I think). He thinks a top as been put in on oil. Maybe but I think earnings could go up dramatically for a couple of quarters as the oil companies sell more and more oil above $50. He said the sector's weight has doubled in the SPX and that is his exit strategy. He said energy has gone from 5% to 10%. I thought it started at 6% but that is splitting hairs on my part.
I have taken some defensive action in the sector a while back. I sold one of the tanker stocks and a more volatile E&P name. At this point most clients own two big foreign integrated oil companies, one oil company with a little refining exposure and one of the Chinese oils. The total weight is in the neighborhood of 11%.
One was the First Israel Fund (ISL). I wrote about this fund on August 7. I bought it thinking it would be an intermediate term hold but I was lucky enough to catch a big move (relative to the time I held it). Despite what I what wrote about the trade I was really buying Benjamin Netanyahu, the recently departed finance minister and one time prime minister. Now that he is gone I am not sure how the situation has changed, if at all.
One point he pounded on was that ISL is trading at a discount to NAV. He warned not to buy it at a premium. I have written about this a few times. If a fund has traded at a premium of 5% or less for an extended period I don't think I would be turned off from buying it. A big change in the discount/premium picture might make me hold off however. A premium of more than 5% and I would wait but if a fund I already owned grew to large premium it would not be an automatic sell. ETFconnect has a chart that shows the historical relationship between the NAV and the market price. I was really surprised that Cramer picked this fund. I heard him on why and it makes sense but I am glad I'm out of the position now.
The other nugget was about energy stocks. If I heard him right he is suggesting lightening up on the group ( not zero exposure, I think). He thinks a top as been put in on oil. Maybe but I think earnings could go up dramatically for a couple of quarters as the oil companies sell more and more oil above $50. He said the sector's weight has doubled in the SPX and that is his exit strategy. He said energy has gone from 5% to 10%. I thought it started at 6% but that is splitting hairs on my part.
I have taken some defensive action in the sector a while back. I sold one of the tanker stocks and a more volatile E&P name. At this point most clients own two big foreign integrated oil companies, one oil company with a little refining exposure and one of the Chinese oils. The total weight is in the neighborhood of 11%.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





5 comments:
So are you saying that you agree or disagree with Cramer on oil?
Well, I'm not sure. The action he suggested I have already taken as far as getting defensive.
I was lucky with how that worked out.
It is not clear to me that the sector will correct in an ugly way. Week after week is going by with oil above $50. given that everyone's target at the brokerage firms seems to be in the $40s I think means that earnings will be significantly above estimates.
The bottom line is I took beta off the table in this group in the spring and I have no plans to cut back further. You can decide whether I disagree or not.
...Should we remember that tech got to over 20% of the S&P weighting? Not that they were worth it, but like T. Boone Pickens said this am, "...the trend is up..."
g
George
actually tech was 30% it its peak and in 1981 or so energy was also close to 30% of the SPX.
It might be helpful to note that the ETF, "ADRE" has a 15% weighting to Israel. The "ISL" has been Cramerized already.
( http://www.etfconnect.com/select/fundpages/etf_funds.asp?MFID=103153 )
Post a Comment